"It was good to have legal scholars and legally-minded people who presented the information as data so I could work with it to run regressions to understand the law’s impact. Not having to compile the data myself freed up my ability to develop measurements and do the analysis, and reduced coding errors I may have introduced because of my lack of legal knowledge."
Bryce’s story:
In 2014, I was looking for data related to prescription drug monitoring programs to identify ways of evaluating their impact because up to that point, any research had been largely inconclusive. I wanted to know what comprised PDMPs in different states. I’m not a lawyer, so when I was looking for legal information, LawAtlas data was really the only data that existed that I could use in my research.
I do not have a legal background, and while I could learn, that’s a lot of time and experience. It was good to have legal scholars and legally-minded people who presented the information as data so I could work with it to run regressions to understand the law’s impact. Not having to compile the data myself freed up my ability to develop measurements and do the analysis, and reduced coding errors I may have introduced because of my lack of legal knowledge.
The complexity of the legal data is also an asset. Basic legal data is often a binary variable — does the law exist in a place or not. That is a flawed analytical mechanism. Whether or not a state law is in place doesn’t tell you much, but being able to see all the components and access robust measures, like reporting requirements, or funding mechanisms, lets you do more complex evaluation. More complexity in the data gives you a better picture of what’s going on.
In an active legal space like the one I study, we can keep passing laws, but if it comes out that it doesn’t have any effect, we’re just wasting our money. Having that legal information allows someone like me, a public policy PhD candidate, to ask what does it mean to have this law in place, and not just the law but what is in the law.
Bryce Pardo has published his research evaluating whether prescription drug monitoring programs reduce opioid overdose in the journal Addiction. He is a PhD candidate at University of Maryland in the Department of Public Policy.